Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

“9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip” – A Participant’s Perspective

“9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip” – A Participant’s Perspective

September 8, 2011
Author: Emily Louise Church
Source: 9/11 Truth News

Hello, my name is Emily Church and I am a mute.

Well, according to the masters of propaganda at the BBC/Renegade Productions.

This summer I participated in a BBC hit piece on 9/11, entitled “Conspiracy Roadtrip”. The premise is simple: five non-believers of the official story journey across the east coast of the USA in search of the truth. On the way we meet “experts” and victims of the attacks, guided by “comedian” Andrew Maxwell who believes the 9/11 commission report was the be all and end all of the 9/11 story.

The show aired a few hours ago and I felt compelled to write my version of what happened on that 8 day roadtrip, to give you the perspective you were not shown by BBC 3.

Firstly, I must tip my hat to them. They did a wonderful editing job. Anyone who has ever had a conversation with me or knows me personally will be very much aware of my opinions re: 9/11, and how outspoken I am about them. However, on this show I appear to be pretty much silent the entire way through.

I wasn’t. Continue reading ‘“9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip” – A Participant’s Perspective’

Climate Change: This is the Worst Scientific Scandal of our Generation

by Prof. Christopher Booker
Global Research, November 28, 2009

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash regarding statistics for global warming.

A week after my colleague James Delingpole, on his Telegraph blog, coined the term “Climategate” to describe the scandal revealed by the leaked emails from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, Google was showing that the word now appears across the internet more than nine million times. But in all these acres of electronic coverage, one hugely relevant point about these thousands of documents has largely been missed.

The reason why even the Guardian’s George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Professor Philip Jones, the CRU’s director, is in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports. Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC’s key scientific contributors, his global temperature record is the most important of the four sets of temperature data on which the IPCC and governments rely – not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Original article

JFK Jr.’s plane crash was originally treated as murder investigation

From Wayne Madsen Report “From Deep Inside The Washington Beltway”

Kennedy was preparing to re-tool “George” magazine to take on investigations of a number of major stories, not least of which was the actual story behind the assassination of his father in Dallas on November 22, 1963. According to an article in Germany’s Bild am Sonntag on August 1, 1999, Kennedy was also preparing to meet with the deputy chief of Mossad, Amiran Levine, at the Oak Room in Manhattan’s Plaza Hotel the Wednesday after Kennedy was killed. The subject was the assassination of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 and that Rabin was assassinated by one of his body guards and not the convicted murderer Yigal Amir.

Kennedy’s friend said the real priority of the “George” publisher was to re-open the case of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the role that the father of the all-but-announced Republican presidential candidate for the upcoming 2000 election — George W. Bush — played in the assassination. Apparently, some documents had come into Kennedy’s possession that pointed to George H. W. Bush as a prime participant, on behalf of the CIA, in President Kennedy’s murder.

On a 1997 visit to see Cuban President Fidel Castro in Havana for an interview for “George,” the Cuban President reportedly told Kennedy a number of details about those behind his father’s assassination. The occasion of Kennedy Jr.’s visit was the 35th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis between his father and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. According to Kennedy’s friend, Castro confided to Kennedy that a mafia ring headed up by Meyer Lansky, who lost his Cuban gambling holdings to Castro’s revolution, and a Canadian Zionist veteran of Israel’s Haganah army, Louis Bloomfield, were the primary planners of the Dallas “hit” on his father. Jack Ruby, who killed the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, worked directly for Lansky’s organization, Kennedy was told.

Continue reading ‘JFK Jr.’s plane crash was originally treated as murder investigation’

9/11 Truth

  • “The US Air Force Shot Down Flight 93″
  • 9/11 Coincidences
  • 9/11 Debunkers Hide From Slam Dunk Evidence Of Controlled Demolition
  • 911 artifacts of melted concrete & steel
  • Architect Richard Gage Thanks FBI for Endorsing 9/11 Evidence
  • Barry Jennings Uncut
  • Crossing the Rubicon
  • Dissent
  • Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – “Not Possible”, “a Whitewash”, “False”
  • FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks
  • FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks
  • Flight 93
  • Hospital Worker: I Saw Osama
  • Improbable Collapse – The Demolition of our Republic
  • Lawyer Says Bin Laden Did Not Orchestrate 9/11 During Terror Trial
  • Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment
  • No BBC, WTC 7 Did Not Collapse “Due To Fire” & The Final 9/11 Mystery Is Not Solved
  • Purdue Simulation Full of Hot Air
  • Shocking New Revelations On 9/11 Ground Zero Cover-Up
  • The Pentagon
  • The Questions of the Hour
  • The Twin Towers
  • Video: 9/11 WMD
  • Videos
  • What Caused the Fiery Ground-Level Explosions Right Before the Collapse of Each Tower?
  • WTC 7
  • WTC 7 Emergency Head Was Building Collapse Specialist
  • WTC7, Barry Jennings, Peter Ganci, Giuliani & Arnold Weick
  • Obama, Afghanistan and Oil

    In an address yesterday to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in Phoenix, Arizona, President Obama said that the United States “didn’t choose to fight in Afghanistan, but was forced to invade that country to stop future Sept. 11-type attacks at home”.


    The fact of the matter is, as this article in The Debate published on August 18 reveals, that “America has wanted a new government in Afghanistan since at least 1998, three years before the attacks on 11 September 2001. The official report from a meeting of the U.S. Government’s foreign policy committee on 12 February 1998, available on the U.S. Government website, confirms that the need for a West-friendly government was recognised long before the War on Terror that followed September 11th”:

    The U.S. Government’s position is that we support multiple pipelines… The Unocal pipeline is among those pipelines that would receive our support under that policy. I would caution that while we do support the project, the U.S. Government has not at this point recognized any governing regime of the transit country, one of the transit countries, Afghanistan, through which that pipeline would be routed. But we do support the project.” [ U.S. House of Reps., “U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998 ]

    The only other possible route [for the desired oil pipeline] is across, Afghanistan which has of course its own unique challenges.” [ “U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998 ]

    CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.” [ “U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998 ]

    The Afghanistan oil pipeline project was finally able to proceed in May 2002. This could not have happened if America had not taken military action to replace the government in Afghanistan.

    Secondly, as the TIMELINE in the same article shows, US military action in Afghanistan began long before the World Trade Center fell.

    So, when Obama says that the US “didn’t choose to fight in Afghanistan, but was forced to invade that country to stop future Sept. 11-type attacks at home”, he is simply CHATTING SHIT.

    The real reason why we are in Afghanistan is oil. As Jon Flanders writes in jonGas, Oil and Afghanistan:

    Most of us know that the Middle East is a center of activity for world oil production. Some of us have heard about the Caspian Sea, and the touted possibilities for great oil resources there. But few would think that rocky, war torn Afghanistan might be part of this energy production picture.Yet it most certainly is. And the information about Afghanistan’s role is readily available on the World Wide Web to anyone who wants to investigate. Indeed, much of the information comes from US government sources like the Voice of America.

    In an interview with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc., on May 28, 2001, Michael Klare, author of the book Resource Wars, and Director of the Five College Program in Peace and World Security Studies based at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, says:

    I think in this case this is a national security consideration that’s driving all of this. The United States has to get that oil from that region [Central Asia] and will make a deal with whatever governments are there in place that are willing to work with us [that is, the US], like the government[s] in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan that are far from ideal with respect to human rights and democratic procedure. And I think that’s a reflection of the view that I write about in my book — we [the US] view oil as a security consideration and we have to protect it by any means necessary, regardless of other considerations, other values.

    Either President Obama has known this all along, and for reasons best known to himself (and his chums on the CFR) is keeping mum about it, or he is a singularly uninformed guy who knows nothing of the work of people like Michael Klare, which is difficult to believe.

    President Obama: If Caspian oil is essential for our national security please say so openly and honestly and lets have an open and honest debate about whether this oil is worth the cost in lives, largesse and our international reputation or whether we should look into other sources of energy, such as hemp and alcohol, but please don’t insult our intelligence with this bullshit about 9/11.

    Continue reading ‘Obama, Afghanistan and Oil’

    Health Care Reform We Can Believe in?

    There’s no doubt about it. Health Care (for those who can afford it), is better in America than it is here in the UK.

    A very wise man once said:

    In America, if you have cancer, chances are that you survive–and, if you have good medical insurance, you stay solvent, and if you don’t, you survive anyway, but you end up bankrupt.

    In the UK, with its creaking at the seams National Health Service, chances are you die, but you stay solvent.

    Obama arsing about with his "fixer" in the Blue Room in the White House. I like the French Empire style deco, but Obama's watered down Health Care Reforms are less to my taste.

    Obama arsing about with his "fixer" in the Blue Room in the White House. I like the French Empire style deco, but Obama's watered down Health Care Reforms are less to my taste.

    I need your help to spread the word and rally the nation around true health care reform which covers everyone and maintains fiscal integrity without breaking our nation’s bank! Your contribution will empower our efforts to continue to fight for the single-payer, not-for-profit health care bill, HR676 “Medicare for All,” which I co-authored with Rep. John Conyers. The bill now has 85 sponsors in the House.” Rep. Dennis Kucinich

    Every mistake made by the Obama White House in the pursuit of health care reform can be traced to the political style and ideological prejudices of Rahm Emanuel, who has repeatedly sought to intimidate progressives and empower conservatives.” Joe Conason

    Health Care in America: The Masquerade is Over!

    Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Global Research, 2009-08-19

    The masquerade is over! The “public option” is … dead.

    Health care reform is now a private option: WHICH FOR PROFIT INSURANCE COMPANY DO YOU WANT?

    You have to choose. And you have to pay. If you have a low income, under HR3200 government will subsidize the private insurance companies and you will still have to pay premiums, co-pays and deductibles.


    Obama’s Enforcer: Not Really Tough Enough

    Joe Conason, Truthdig, Aug 20, 2009

    If the Democrats fail to pass real changes in the health care system this year—rather than a sham that mimics and mocks reform—they will have nobody to blame but themselves. Or at least nobody to blame but other Democrats, notably those in the White House who have never been committed to this most venerable and fundamental aspect of party policy.



    Excerpted from Hush! Hush! Sweet Sarah!
    “The Rant” by Tom Degan
    Wednesday, August 19, 2009

    “As an American who has been living in Europe for most of the last 20 years, one who has visited doctors numerous times in four different countries, whose two children were brought into this world in European hospitals (France and England), who has himself spent a week in a public British hospital, and who underwent an operation in a private British clinic, I think I can say a thing or two about health care in Europe. Continue reading ‘Health Care Reform We Can Believe in?’

    The Secrets of China’s Economy: The Government Owns the Banks rather than the Reverse

    How can China’s stimulus plan be working so well, when ours is barely working at all? The answer may be simple: China has not let its banking system run roughshod over its productive economy. Chinese banks work for the people rather than the reverse.” Ellen Brown

    MASH dude Demarco slays the China Banks

    MASH dude Demarco slays the China Banks

    Ellen Brown | Global Research | August 18, 2009

    “The banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. They frankly own the place.” — U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, Democratic Party Whip, April 30, 2009

    webWhile the U.S. spends trillions of dollars to bail out its banking system, leaving its economy to languish, China is being called a “miracle economy” that has decoupled from the rest of the world. As the rest of the world sinks into the worst recession since the 1930s, China has maintained a phenomenal 8% annual growth rate. Those are the reports, but commentators are dubious. They ask how that growth is possible, when other countries relying heavily on exports have suffered major downturns and remain in the doldrums. Economist Richard Wolff skeptically observes:

    We now have a situation in the world where we have a global capitalist crisis. Everywhere, consumption is down. Everywhere, people are buying fewer goods, including goods from China. How is it possible that in that society, so dependent on the world economy, they could now have an explosive growth? Their stock market is now 100 percent higher than at its low — nothing remotely like that hardly anywhere in the world, certainly not in the United States or Europe. How is that possible? In order to believe what the Chinese are saying, you would have to agree that in a matter of months, at most a year, no more, they have been able to transform their economy from an export-based powerhouse to a domestically focused industrial engine. Nowhere in the world has that ever taken less than decades.”


    Bank of China to ‘cherry-pick’ UK mortgage customers as lending drought persists | 20 Aug 2009

    Bank of China, the country’s third biggest bank, plans to ‘cherry-pick’ UK mortgage customers as the lending drought in Britain remains.

    In an interview with Bloomberg, Xixu Sun, the head of Bank of China’s retail operations in the UK, said “before the financial crisis you didn’t have a choice, you couldn’t cherry-pick the good customers.

    Now you have that choice, because there’s a drought in terms of mortgage loans provided by banks.”

    Bank of China is looking to become a major household name in Britain’s mortgage market, which has seen lending slump as the recession drives up bad loans at many banks. Although house prices have showed signs of stabilisng in recent weeks, the volume of mortgages approved is still less than half the 108,000 monthly average seen between the boom years of 2003 and 2007.


    How you can support this blog

    Come boomtime or downturn, we all have to make purchases, and one way many of us do so is online. Please make all your online purchases through our Online Store below and that way you will be supporting this blog...and, at the same time, saving yourself a bit of money.

    A Nation Rising

    The Mysterious Collapse of WTC 7

    William Engdahl: A Century of War

    JFK and the Unspeakable

    13 Bankers

    The Big Ripoff

    Hamilton’s Curse

    Churchill, Hitler, and…



    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 27 other followers