Archive for June, 2010

Arianna Huffington: Book Club Pick: Why 13 Bankers Is a Must-Read for Barack Obama, Chris Dodd, and Everyone Who Wants to Avoid Another Financial Crisis

Arianna Huffington | HuffPost | April 7, 2010 07:42 PM

The cliché tells us that you can’t judge a book by its cover. Agreed. But sometimes you can tell a lot about a book by the blurbs on its cover (and just inside the cover).

Such is the case with Simon Johnson and James Kwak’s 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, this month’s HuffPost Book Club pick. You know a book is onto something when, even in these politically polarized times, and dealing with a hot button issue like financial reform, it features side-by-side praise from both Jim Bunning and Alan Grayson. Yes, that Jim Bunning, who says that the book “makes it clear why ending ‘too big to fail’ and reforming the institutions that perpetuate it… are essential for our nation’s future economic prosperity and, more fundamentally, our democratic system.” Clearly, the need to reform our out-of-control financial system is not a right vs. left issue. (Full disclosure: I also did a blurb for the book).

The book is also incredibly timely, with the Senate gearing up for a floor debate on Sen. Dodd’s financial reform bill when it returns from Easter break. While offering an in-depth explanation of the factors that led to the financial crisis — a crisis Johnson and Kwak prove beyond any doubt is not over — 13 Bankers has the immediacy and of-the-moment feel of a blog post, the sense that this is happening now.

Original Article

JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters

Two reviews of James W. Douglass’ book, JFK and the Unspeakable, one by Oliver Stone, published Friday, July 24, on HuffPo, the other by Nick Anez on Amazon:

Oliver Stone: Military-Intelligence Complex Killed JFK

Oliver Stone | Huffington Post | Friday, July 24, 2009

JFK and the Unspeakable

9781570757556

The murder of President Kennedy was a seminal event for me and for millions of Americans. It changed the course of history. It was a crushing blow to our country and to millions of people around the world. It put an abrupt end to a period of a misunderstood idealism, akin to the spirit of 1989 when the Soviet bloc to began to thaw and 2008, when our new American President was fairly elected.

Today, more than 45 years later, profound doubts persist about how President Kennedy was killed and why. My film JFK was a metaphor for all those doubts, suspicions and unanswered questions. Now an extraordinary new book offers the best account I have read of this tragedy and its significance. That book is James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. It is a book that deserves the attention of all Americans; it is one of those rare books that, by helping us understand our history, has the power to change it.

The subtitle sums up Douglass’s purpose: Why He Died and Why it Matters. In his beautifully written and exhaustively researched treatment, Douglass lays out the “motive” for Kennedy’s assassination. Simply, he traces a process of steady conversion by Kennedy from his origins as a traditional Cold Warrior to his determination to pull the world back from the edge of destruction.

Read more…

And We Are All Mortal

Nick Anez | Amazon.com | June 8, 2008

In James W. Douglass’ outstanding new book, “JFK and the Unspeakable,” the author explains the title in his introduction. Coined by spiritual writer Thomas Merton, The Unspeakable refers to “an evil whose depth and deceit seemed to go beyond the capacity of words to describe.” Regarding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the Unspeakable succeeded due to deniability by the nation’s citizens of the horrifying truth of the event and to plausible deniability by the government agencies responsible for the murder. (Vincent Bugliosi’s recent fictional paperweight is a perfect example of the plausible deniability that allows the Unspeakable to thrive.)

Many excellent books have proven that the assassination of JFK was the result of a conspiracy. Douglass verifies the certainty of the conspiracy and, as the subtitle of the book states, explains “Why He Died and Why It Matters.” He scrutinizes the historical facts surrounding the assassination, from the creation of the CIA to the gradual obliteration of the freedoms upon which this nation was founded.

This book is primarily the story of John F. Kennedy who changes from a Cold Warrior to an altruistic leader willing to risk his life to ensure that the world’s children will not become victims of a nuclear catastrophe. Equal time is spent on JFK’s presidency as on the assassination but one of the many rewards of this book is the author’s capacity to show the relationship between his policies and his death. And the book is a tragedy because it gradually becomes obvious that each step he makes toward peace steadily increases the hatred of his enemies who will eventually betray him.

Continue reading ‘JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters’

JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters

Review of James Douglass’ Book

by Edward Curtin

Global Research, November 25, 2009

Despite a treasure-trove of new information having emerged over the last forty-six years, there are many people who still think who killed President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and why are unanswerable questions. There are others who cling to the Lee Harvey Oswald “lone-nut” explanation proffered by the Warren Commission. Both groups agree, however, that whatever the truth, it has no contemporary relevance but is old-hat, history, stuff for conspiracy-obsessed people with nothing better to do. The general thinking is that the assassination occurred almost a half-century ago, so let’s move on.

Nothing could be further from the truth, as James Douglass shows in his extraordinary book, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters (Orbis Books, 2008). It is clearly one of the best books ever written on the Kennedy assassination and deserves a vast readership. It is bound to roil the waters of complacency that have submerged the truth of this key event in modern American history.

It’s not often that the intersection of history and contemporary events pose such a startling and chilling lesson as does the contemplation of the murder of JFK on November 22, 1963 juxtaposed with the situations faced by President Obama today. So far, at least, Obama’s behavior has mirrored Johnson’s, not Kennedy’s, as he has escalated the war in Afghanistan by 34,000. One can’t but help think that the thought of JFK’s fate might not be far from his mind as he contemplates his next move in Afghanistan.

[Read more...]

Life, Liberty, and the Bloody Scramble for Real Estate in Andrew Jackson’s America

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”                   

Thus begins  the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. The words, as amended by John Adams and James Madison, are those of Thomas Jefferson, who drew heavily on George Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights of June 12, 1776, which begins with the words: “That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” Both Jefferson and Mason drew heavily on the seventeenth-century English philosoper, John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government. (Whereas, Jefferson has, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”, Locke has “life, liberty, and the pursuit of property”.)                

I do not know when I first became familiar with these ringing words of the Declaration of Independence, but they certainly forced their way onto my attention when I read them on one of the original Dunlap versions of the Declaration on one of the interior walls of the Old State House in Boston, Massachussetts, on my very first day in America in the July of 2004. That I was reading from the very document that would have been read from to the people of Boston from this very building I found very moving.                

Fifteen days later, on my last full day in America, I found myself again reading Thomas Jefferson’s words, this time those from his Notes on the State of Virginia, which I came across on Panel Three of the Four Panels inside the Jefferson Memorial in Washington: “Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.” I had no doubt that the words were a reference to slavery.                

As everyone knows, Jefferson was himself himself a slave owner, as indeed was George Mason, who once called it a “slow Poison” that “is daily contaminating the Minds & Morals of our People”, and that other George, George Washington himself.                

That men who found slavery morally abhorrent were themselves slave owners is one of the many contradictions in America’s early history that Kenneth C. Davis explores in his latest book, A Nation Rising. Commenting the fact that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Robert E. Lee were all slave owners–albeit, in the eyes of their admirers, “enlightened owners, who treated their slaves well and sought to emancipate some”–he writes: “Washington, his admirers love to note, wouldn’t sell his slaves because he didn’t want to break up families. He treated them well. He emancipated his slaves in his will. But in an earlier time, Washington had offered rewards for the return of runaways. And when he took slaves to New York to serve him as president, they certainly were not free to leave. As for Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence was totally dependent upon slave labor to operate his plantation, profitably or not. He also contemplated emancipation of his slaves, but was too much in debt to do so at his death. Robert E. Lee was said to be morally opposed to slavery, yet he and the other Lees of Virginia were entrenched members of Virginia’s slave aristocracy.                

Washington with slaves on Mt. Vernon

  

“These men owned human beings. All the niceties about their feelings and intentions cannot ameliorate the fact. They had the power of life and death over other human beings, people they could buy and sell at will. And, like many slaveholders, they knew slavery was wrong and an offense to the ideals for which they had fought.”        

Continue reading ‘Life, Liberty, and the Bloody Scramble for Real Estate in Andrew Jackson’s America’


How you can support this blog

Come boomtime or downturn, we all have to make purchases, and one way many of us do so is online. Please make all your online purchases through our Online Store below and that way you will be supporting this blog...and, at the same time, saving yourself a bit of money.

A Nation Rising

The Mysterious Collapse of WTC 7

William Engdahl: A Century of War

JFK and the Unspeakable

13 Bankers

The Big Ripoff

Hamilton’s Curse

Churchill, Hitler, and…

Pages


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.