Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners

Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview

by Prof David Ray Griffin
Global Research, January 12, 2010

On November 27, 2009, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s Fifth Estate program aired a show entitled “9/11: The Unofficial Story,”1 for which I, along with a few other members of the 9/11 Truth Movement, was interviewed. In the most important part of my interview, I pointed out that, according to the FBI’s report on phone calls from the airliners provided in 2006 for the Moussaoui trial, Barbara Olson’s only call from Flight 77 was “unconnected” and hence lasted “0 seconds.” Although this Fifth Estate program showed only a brief portion of my discussion of alleged phone calls from the 9/11 airliners, its website subsequently made available a 22-minute video containing this discussion.2

Shortly thereafter, a portion of this video, under the title “David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Cell Phone Calls: Exclusive CBC Interview,” was posted on You Tube,3 after which it was posted on 911 Blogger.4 This latter posting resulted in considerable discussion, during which some claims contradicting my position were made. In this essay, I respond to the most important of these claims, namely:

1. The FBI has not admitted that cell phone calls from high-altitude airliners on 9/11 were impossible.

2. There is no evidence that some of the reported 9/11 phone calls were faked.

3. American Airlines’ Boeing 757s, and hence its Flight 77, had onboard phones.

4. The FBI’s report on phone calls from the 9/11 airliners did not undermine Ted Olson’s report about receiving phone calls from his wife.

The four sections of this essay will respond to these four claims in order.

[Source]

Related Story: Ted Olson’s Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials

Prince Charles tried to stop war

Prince thought Tony Blair was wrong on Iraq and mocked him as 'our glorious leader'

By Robert Jobson, 03/01/2010

PRINCE Charles was so convinced Tony Blair was WRONG to take Britain to war in Iraq he broke Royal tradition and actively campaigned against the invasion, the News of the World can reveal.

Behind closed doors, the heir to the throne voiced his fears to senior politicians and mounted a staunch anti-war crusade in which he:

  • ATTACKED the then prime minister’s stance, mockingly calling him “our glorious leader”.
  • BLAMED American president George W Bush for action he believed to be misguided after reviewing secret intelligence.
  • WARNED the war would only stir up more serious trouble in the region.
  • ACCUSED western leaders of failing to deal with what he feels is the real cause of Islamic unrest – the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Meddling

Our extraordinary revelations – from the most impeccable inside sources – are certain to pile pressure on former premier Blair as he prepares to give evidence to the Chilcott inquiry into the war.

And they come as ex-PM Sir John Major twisted the knife yesterday, accusing Blair’s handling of the 2003 invasion of damaging trust in the UK political system more than the expenses scandal.

Read more…

The Underwear Bomber – Crushing Freedom With Phony Arab Terrorism

Joe Quinn | SOTT.net | Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:30 EST

Strange as it may seem, a couple of weeks ago as I ruminated on Obama’s broken promise to bring the troops home, his attempt to out-warmonger the Bush administration and his plummeting popularity, I thought to myself: “ya know, what that guy (or rather the disgruntled US public) needs is a good old fashioned ‘Muslim terror attack’. Preferably one that includes a ranting ‘terrorist’ message about Afghanistan and ’slaughtering infidels’. That’ll soon silence the rabble and get them behind Obama’s Afghan surge!”

And so it was that, as I sipped my eggnog on Christmas day, I was shockingly unsurprised to read the headlines about an ‘underwear bomb’ (as shown above).

To adequately address the recent airline “terror attack” in Detroit and the airborne terror attacks in Yemen we must delve into the topsy turvey world of the ‘war on terror’, where black is white, up is down, and shady Middle Eastern-looking men and your knickers share equal rating on the US DHS threat-o-meter. In short, it’s no easy task. So first of all, let me say a few words about airports and the old and new airport “security measures”.

Read more…

Monica Lewinsky: Bill Clinton lied under oath about our relationship

Sara Nelson | Daily Mail | 18th December 2009

Monica Lewinsky says former President Bill Clinton lied under oath when he described their relationship during an impeachment trial, a new book claims.

The Death of American Virtue, by law professor Ken Gormley, is due to be published in February and also alleges that Clinton had a long-running affair with Susan McDougal, a key player in the Whitewater scandal.

Despite offering no concrete evidence of the affair, Gormley told Politico.com: ‘I feel very, very comfortable with that conclusion after having conducted extensive interviews and seen documents that were not generally accessible to the public.’

In an email to Gormley, Lewinsky made it clear she believes the president lied.

‘There was no leeway [there] on the veracity of his statements because they asked him detailed and specific questions to which he answered untruthfully,’ she wrote.

The book reportedly paints an unflattering portrait of Clinton and independent counsel Kenneth Starr who led the inquiry into the affair.

Clinton was impeached in 1998 but not thrown out of office.

According to Gormley, Starr’s successor, Robert Ray, was prepared to indict Clinton after he left office in January 2001 unless he admitted to lying under oath about the Lewinsky relationship, the New York Daily News reported.

Ray relented, but ‘President Clinton would never fully grasp how close he came,’ Gormley claims.

Clinton initially swore under oath that he ‘did not have sexual relations’ with Lewinsky but later admitted that he had misled the American public.

Lewinsky revealed her relationship with the president involved oral sex but not sexual intercourse.

She famously kept a blue dress which she claimed held DNA evidence of their affair. Continue reading ‘Monica Lewinsky: Bill Clinton lied under oath about our relationship’

Climate Change: This is the Worst Scientific Scandal of our Generation

by Prof. Christopher Booker
Global Research, November 28, 2009
Telegraph

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash regarding statistics for global warming.

A week after my colleague James Delingpole, on his Telegraph blog, coined the term “Climategate” to describe the scandal revealed by the leaked emails from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, Google was showing that the word now appears across the internet more than nine million times. But in all these acres of electronic coverage, one hugely relevant point about these thousands of documents has largely been missed.

The reason why even the Guardian’s George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Professor Philip Jones, the CRU’s director, is in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports. Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC’s key scientific contributors, his global temperature record is the most important of the four sets of temperature data on which the IPCC and governments rely – not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Original article

JFK Jr.’s plane crash was originally treated as murder investigation

From Wayne Madsen Report “From Deep Inside The Washington Beltway”

Kennedy was preparing to re-tool “George” magazine to take on investigations of a number of major stories, not least of which was the actual story behind the assassination of his father in Dallas on November 22, 1963. According to an article in Germany’s Bild am Sonntag on August 1, 1999, Kennedy was also preparing to meet with the deputy chief of Mossad, Amiran Levine, at the Oak Room in Manhattan’s Plaza Hotel the Wednesday after Kennedy was killed. The subject was the assassination of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 and that Rabin was assassinated by one of his body guards and not the convicted murderer Yigal Amir.

Kennedy’s friend said the real priority of the “George” publisher was to re-open the case of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the role that the father of the all-but-announced Republican presidential candidate for the upcoming 2000 election — George W. Bush — played in the assassination. Apparently, some documents had come into Kennedy’s possession that pointed to George H. W. Bush as a prime participant, on behalf of the CIA, in President Kennedy’s murder.

On a 1997 visit to see Cuban President Fidel Castro in Havana for an interview for “George,” the Cuban President reportedly told Kennedy a number of details about those behind his father’s assassination. The occasion of Kennedy Jr.’s visit was the 35th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis between his father and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. According to Kennedy’s friend, Castro confided to Kennedy that a mafia ring headed up by Meyer Lansky, who lost his Cuban gambling holdings to Castro’s revolution, and a Canadian Zionist veteran of Israel’s Haganah army, Louis Bloomfield, were the primary planners of the Dallas “hit” on his father. Jack Ruby, who killed the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, worked directly for Lansky’s organization, Kennedy was told.

Continue reading ‘JFK Jr.’s plane crash was originally treated as murder investigation’

9/11 Truth

  • “The US Air Force Shot Down Flight 93″
  • 9-11 NEW WORLD RISING (FINAL DIRECTOR’S CUT)
  • 9/11 Coincidences
  • 9/11 CONSPIRACY – NORMAN MINETTA TALKS ABOUT CHENEY ORDERS
  • 9/11 Debunkers Hide From Slam Dunk Evidence Of Controlled Demolition
  • 911 artifacts of melted concrete & steel
  • Architect Richard Gage Thanks FBI for Endorsing 9/11 Evidence
  • Barry Jennings Uncut
  • Crossing the Rubicon
  • Dissent
  • Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – “Not Possible”, “a Whitewash”, “False”
  • FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks
  • FBI Refuses To Confirm Identities Of 4 Aircraft Used During 9/11 Attacks
  • Flight 93
  • Hospital Worker: I Saw Osama
  • Improbable Collapse – The Demolition of our Republic
  • Lawyer Says Bin Laden Did Not Orchestrate 9/11 During Terror Trial
  • MARVIN BUSH, BUILDING 7 AND FORBIDDEN QUESTIONS
  • Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment
  • No BBC, WTC 7 Did Not Collapse “Due To Fire” & The Final 9/11 Mystery Is Not Solved
  • Purdue Simulation Full of Hot Air
  • Shocking New Revelations On 9/11 Ground Zero Cover-Up
  • The Pentagon
  • The Questions of the Hour
  • The Twin Towers
  • Video: 9/11 WMD
  • Videos
  • What Caused the Fiery Ground-Level Explosions Right Before the Collapse of Each Tower?
  • WTC 7
  • WTC 7 Emergency Head Was Building Collapse Specialist
  • WTC7, Barry Jennings, Peter Ganci, Giuliani & Arnold Weick
  • Obama, Afghanistan and Oil

    In an address yesterday to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in Phoenix, Arizona, President Obama said that the United States “didn’t choose to fight in Afghanistan, but was forced to invade that country to stop future Sept. 11-type attacks at home”.

    Really?

    The fact of the matter is, as this article in The Debate published on August 18 reveals, that “America has wanted a new government in Afghanistan since at least 1998, three years before the attacks on 11 September 2001. The official report from a meeting of the U.S. Government’s foreign policy committee on 12 February 1998, available on the U.S. Government website, confirms that the need for a West-friendly government was recognised long before the War on Terror that followed September 11th”:

    The U.S. Government’s position is that we support multiple pipelines… The Unocal pipeline is among those pipelines that would receive our support under that policy. I would caution that while we do support the project, the U.S. Government has not at this point recognized any governing regime of the transit country, one of the transit countries, Afghanistan, through which that pipeline would be routed. But we do support the project.” [ U.S. House of Reps., "U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics", 12 Feb 1998 ]

    The only other possible route [for the desired oil pipeline] is across, Afghanistan which has of course its own unique challenges.” [ "U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics", 12 Feb 1998 ]

    CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.” [ "U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics", 12 Feb 1998 ]

    The Afghanistan oil pipeline project was finally able to proceed in May 2002. This could not have happened if America had not taken military action to replace the government in Afghanistan.

    Secondly, as the TIMELINE in the same article shows, US military action in Afghanistan began long before the World Trade Center fell.

    So, when Obama says that the US “didn’t choose to fight in Afghanistan, but was forced to invade that country to stop future Sept. 11-type attacks at home”, he is simply CHATTING SHIT.

    The real reason why we are in Afghanistan is oil. As Jon Flanders writes in jonGas, Oil and Afghanistan:

    Most of us know that the Middle East is a center of activity for world oil production. Some of us have heard about the Caspian Sea, and the touted possibilities for great oil resources there. But few would think that rocky, war torn Afghanistan might be part of this energy production picture.Yet it most certainly is. And the information about Afghanistan’s role is readily available on the World Wide Web to anyone who wants to investigate. Indeed, much of the information comes from US government sources like the Voice of America.

    In an interview with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc., on May 28, 2001, Michael Klare, author of the book Resource Wars, and Director of the Five College Program in Peace and World Security Studies based at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, says:

    I think in this case this is a national security consideration that’s driving all of this. The United States has to get that oil from that region [Central Asia] and will make a deal with whatever governments are there in place that are willing to work with us [that is, the US], like the government[s] in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan that are far from ideal with respect to human rights and democratic procedure. And I think that’s a reflection of the view that I write about in my book — we [the US] view oil as a security consideration and we have to protect it by any means necessary, regardless of other considerations, other values.

    Either President Obama has known this all along, and for reasons best known to himself (and his chums on the CFR) is keeping mum about it, or he is a singularly uninformed guy who knows nothing of the work of people like Michael Klare, which is difficult to believe.

    President Obama: If Caspian oil is essential for our national security please say so openly and honestly and lets have an open and honest debate about whether this oil is worth the cost in lives, largesse and our international reputation or whether we should look into other sources of energy, such as hemp and alcohol, but please don’t insult our intelligence with this bullshit about 9/11.

    Continue reading ‘Obama, Afghanistan and Oil’

    Health Care Reform We Can Believe in?

    There’s no doubt about it. Health Care (for those who can afford it), is better in America than it is here in the UK.

    A very wise man once said:

    In America, if you have cancer, chances are that you survive–and, if you have good medical insurance, you stay solvent, and if you don’t, you survive anyway, but you end up bankrupt.

    In the UK, with its creaking at the seams National Health Service, chances are you die, but you stay solvent.

    Obama arsing about with his "fixer" in the Blue Room in the White House. I like the French Empire style deco, but Obama's watered down Health Care Reforms are less to my taste.

    Obama arsing about with his "fixer" in the Blue Room in the White House. I like the French Empire style deco, but Obama's watered down Health Care Reforms are less to my taste.

    I need your help to spread the word and rally the nation around true health care reform which covers everyone and maintains fiscal integrity without breaking our nation’s bank! Your contribution will empower our efforts to continue to fight for the single-payer, not-for-profit health care bill, HR676 “Medicare for All,” which I co-authored with Rep. John Conyers. The bill now has 85 sponsors in the House.” Rep. Dennis Kucinich

    Every mistake made by the Obama White House in the pursuit of health care reform can be traced to the political style and ideological prejudices of Rahm Emanuel, who has repeatedly sought to intimidate progressives and empower conservatives.” Joe Conason

    Health Care in America: The Masquerade is Over!

    Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Global Research, 2009-08-19

    The masquerade is over! The “public option” is … dead.

    Health care reform is now a private option: WHICH FOR PROFIT INSURANCE COMPANY DO YOU WANT?

    You have to choose. And you have to pay. If you have a low income, under HR3200 government will subsidize the private insurance companies and you will still have to pay premiums, co-pays and deductibles.

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Obama’s Enforcer: Not Really Tough Enough

    Joe Conason, Truthdig, Aug 20, 2009

    If the Democrats fail to pass real changes in the health care system this year—rather than a sham that mimics and mocks reform—they will have nobody to blame but themselves. Or at least nobody to blame but other Democrats, notably those in the White House who have never been committed to this most venerable and fundamental aspect of party policy.

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    HELL CARE

    Excerpted from Hush! Hush! Sweet Sarah!
    “The Rant” by Tom Degan
    Wednesday, August 19, 2009

    “As an American who has been living in Europe for most of the last 20 years, one who has visited doctors numerous times in four different countries, whose two children were brought into this world in European hospitals (France and England), who has himself spent a week in a public British hospital, and who underwent an operation in a private British clinic, I think I can say a thing or two about health care in Europe. Continue reading ‘Health Care Reform We Can Believe in?’

    The Secrets of China’s Economy: The Government Owns the Banks rather than the Reverse

    How can China’s stimulus plan be working so well, when ours is barely working at all? The answer may be simple: China has not let its banking system run roughshod over its productive economy. Chinese banks work for the people rather than the reverse.” Ellen Brown

    MASH dude Demarco slays the China Banks

    MASH dude Demarco slays the China Banks

    Ellen Brown | Global Research | August 18, 2009

    “The banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. They frankly own the place.” — U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, Democratic Party Whip, April 30, 2009

    webWhile the U.S. spends trillions of dollars to bail out its banking system, leaving its economy to languish, China is being called a “miracle economy” that has decoupled from the rest of the world. As the rest of the world sinks into the worst recession since the 1930s, China has maintained a phenomenal 8% annual growth rate. Those are the reports, but commentators are dubious. They ask how that growth is possible, when other countries relying heavily on exports have suffered major downturns and remain in the doldrums. Economist Richard Wolff skeptically observes:

    We now have a situation in the world where we have a global capitalist crisis. Everywhere, consumption is down. Everywhere, people are buying fewer goods, including goods from China. How is it possible that in that society, so dependent on the world economy, they could now have an explosive growth? Their stock market is now 100 percent higher than at its low — nothing remotely like that hardly anywhere in the world, certainly not in the United States or Europe. How is that possible? In order to believe what the Chinese are saying, you would have to agree that in a matter of months, at most a year, no more, they have been able to transform their economy from an export-based powerhouse to a domestically focused industrial engine. Nowhere in the world has that ever taken less than decades.”

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Bank of China to ‘cherry-pick’ UK mortgage customers as lending drought persists

    Telegraph.co.uk | 20 Aug 2009

    Bank of China, the country’s third biggest bank, plans to ‘cherry-pick’ UK mortgage customers as the lending drought in Britain remains.

    In an interview with Bloomberg, Xixu Sun, the head of Bank of China’s retail operations in the UK, said “before the financial crisis you didn’t have a choice, you couldn’t cherry-pick the good customers.

    Now you have that choice, because there’s a drought in terms of mortgage loans provided by banks.”

    Bank of China is looking to become a major household name in Britain’s mortgage market, which has seen lending slump as the recession drives up bad loans at many banks. Although house prices have showed signs of stabilisng in recent weeks, the volume of mortgages approved is still less than half the 108,000 monthly average seen between the boom years of 2003 and 2007.

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Next Page »


    How you can support this blog

    Come boomtime or downturn, we all have to make purchases, and one way many of us do so is online. Please make all your online purchases through our Online Store below and that way you will be supporting this blog...and, at the same time, saving yourself a bit of money.

    The Big Ripoff

    Hamilton’s Curse

    Churchill, Hitler, and…

    Pages

    Win spa breaks in France!
    Answer our survey and you could win one of this five spa breaks in Brittany, Aquitaine, Riviera, Rhone-Alps or Auvergne.